| [ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
GNU CC predefines two magic identifiers to hold the name of the current
function. The identifier __FUNCTION__ holds the name of the function
as it appears in the source. The identifier __PRETTY_FUNCTION__
holds the name of the function pretty printed in a language specific
fashion.
These names are always the same in a C function, but in a C++ function they may be different. For example, this program:
extern "C" {
extern int printf (char *, ...);
}
class a {
public:
sub (int i)
{
printf ("__FUNCTION__ = %s\n", __FUNCTION__);
printf ("__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = %s\n", __PRETTY_FUNCTION__);
}
};
int
main (void)
{
a ax;
ax.sub (0);
return 0;
}
|
gives this output:
__FUNCTION__ = sub __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = int a::sub (int) |
The compiler automagically replaces the identifiers with a string
literal containing the appropriate name. Thus, they are neither
preprocessor macros, like __FILE__ and __LINE__, nor
variables. This means that they catenate with other string literals, and
that they can be used to initialize char arrays. For example
char here[] = "Function " __FUNCTION__ " in " __FILE__; |
On the other hand, `#ifdef __FUNCTION__' does not have any special
meaning inside a function, since the preprocessor does not do anything
special with the identifier __FUNCTION__.
GNU CC also supports the magic word __func__, defined by the
ISO standard C99:
The identifier
appeared, where function-name is the name of the lexically-enclosing function. This name is the unadorned name of the function. |
By this definition, __func__ is a variable, not a string literal.
In particular, __func__ does not catenate with other string
literals.
In C++, __FUNCTION__ and __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ are
variables, declared in the same way as __func__.
| [ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |